Archive for October, 2007

Seeing is Believing

October 29, 2007

Emily McCue, a Watershed intern with the Office of Surface Mining, like many college students felt “a tinge of skepticism concerning the entire mining process”. It’s easy to understand why when universities like Northern KY University and others make books like Lost Mountain required reading.

Emily, pursuing an Environmental Engineering Major and Environmental Science Minor at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, was ready with “with three years worth of technical questions regarding mining hazards and reclamation inadequacies” for Dave Blankenship, Director of Safety and Environmental Affairs, and his assistant, Teresa McHargue both from TECO Coal. They were to be Emily’s tour guide on a trip to some reclaimed surface mines in Kentucky.

Little did Emily know by the time her tour was over she not only would have a greater understanding of the reclamation process but that the memory of clouded streams that had been forged into her mind would be replaced with images of living, breathing ecosystems.

CLICK HERE TO READ EMILY’S STORY

Peabody is Coming to KY

October 29, 2007

Peabody considering 5 counties for natural gas plant
LOUISVILLE — Peabody Energy Corp. has narrowed its search for a place to put a potential $3 billion coal-to-natural gas plant to five Western Kentucky counties, Gov. Ernie Fletcher said today at a news conference on the University of Louisville campus.

Counties still being considered by Peabody include: Henderson, Union, Ohio, Webster and Muhlenberg. The St. Louis-based company said it was previously considering sites in Kentucky, Illinois and Indiana.

Rick Bowen, a Peabody executive, said the company will not know for sure where the plant will be built, or even if it will be built, until an expensive and lengthy feasibility study is completed.

He said the plant won’t likely be operational until 2012. The project is expected to create about 550 permanent jobs, including 375 coal mining-related jobs.

Asked if the timing of the announcement was designed to help his re-election chances next Tuesday, Fletcher said the announcement would have come earlier if the Democratic controlled state House had not walked out of a special session the governor called in July.

The legislature eventually approved a new incentive program in August that was used last week to provide Peabody with preliminary approval for $250 million in tax incentives for the project.

Buffer Zone Rule Needs Clarity

October 16, 2007

As a college intern working for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1975, I researched 19th-century land grants to find where grist mills had been located adjacent to rivers. The Corps used this documentation to claim jurisdiction over those streams based on their historic use as navigable waterways for transporting goods downstream to market.

When Congress passed the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, it used a stream definition similar to the Corps’ in establishing a buffer-zone rule to place restrictions on mining activities adjacent to major waterways. SMCRA regulations recognize that overburden and impurities mined with coal require disposal and provide stringent procedures for such practices in smaller watersheds.

Recent legal challenges to surface mining by protest groups now want no disturbance within a 100-foot buffer zone of intermittent streams having drainage areas of about 14 acres, which are normally dry and flow only in response to rainfall events. Even a single underground mine disturbs more than 14 acres, so prohibiting filling in small watersheds would abolish all coal mining, not just surface mining.

In the Tennessee River valley, 64 percent of our electricity is generated from burning coal, and 29 percent comes from nuclear reactors. TVA is adding new reactors at a rate of one unit every five years to help meet increasing demands for electricity. Add the current expansion rate in renewable green power to the mix, and even with energy conservation and no growth in demand, it would take TVA at least 65 years to replace its current coal-fired generating capacity. If the buffer-zone rule is applied to small watersheds and coal mining ceases today, how would our demand for electricity be met for the next 65 years?

If coal mining is banned in areas impacting more than 14 acres, should all construction with similar disturbance be banned? If so, every town, highway, commercial development, subdivision and farm would be adversely impacted.

Even the recent construction of the News Sentinel building would have violated an intermittent stream buffer-zone rule, as would the construction of TVA’s wind turbines on Buffalo Mountain and any new nuclear reactors.

Taking the buffer-zone rule to such an extreme seems silly when compared to the infrastructure already in place around us. Yet the U.S. Office of Surface Mining is faced with lawsuit after lawsuit making such demands. Even when protest groups lose the lawsuits, they win when the government reimburses their legal fees. Consequently, attorneys and expert witnesses wait in line to represent them, while taxpayers fund these exercises in futility.

What will this rule make legal that was illegal before? Nothing. OSM is clarifying the intent of Congress when SMCRA was enacted, so it can devote its time to enforcing mining regulations and reclaiming abandoned mine land instead of fighting frivolous lawsuits.<more/>Has there been a significant difference in the way the Bush administration treats the mining buffer-zone rule compared to previous administrations? No. According to its Web site, “OSM has been consistent in its interpretation and enforcement of the stream buffer-zone rule requirements over the past 30 years.”

If protesters want to reduce the amount of coal that must be mined to fuel our economy, they can voluntarily pay more for renewable energy through TVA’s Green Power Switch program or simply turn the circuit breakers in their offices to the “off” position. Under no circumstances should taxpayers be funding the legal games of protestors to reinterpret what SMCRA already defines.

Barry Thacker is an engineer, president of Geo/Environmental Associates Inc. and founder of the nonprofit Coal Creek Watershed Foundation Inc. in Knoxville. His e-mail address is barryt@geoe.com.

Paper Sings Same Old Anti-Coal Song!

October 16, 2007

And Daddy won’t you take me back to Muhlenberg county,

“Down by the Green River, where Paradise lay.

“Well I’m sorry, my son, but you’re too late in askin’.

“Mr. Peabody’s coal train has hauled it away.”

Western Kentuckians love to sing this refrain from John Prine’s Paradise as much as Rocky Top thrills Tennesseans. But I can’t believe we’re still hearing the essence of this song — coal wealth leaving Kentucky — especially from educated people.

The Aug. 29 editorial stated this in two places: “Kentucky’s abundant natural resources have long been mined to produce wealth in other states” and an “out-of-state company will mine coal and take the profits.”

Why are only coal companies accused of hauling away the wealth? How is coal different from Ford, IBM, Lexmark, UPS, Toyota, Walgreen’s, Wal-Mart, McDonald’s, Kroger and a host of multistate corporations operating in Kentucky? Even the Herald-Leader is owned by The McClatchy Company, an out-of-state corporation.

Coal provides numerous economic positives. We directly employ more than 15,000 coal miners, who make an average annual wage of $48,000. With a 4-to-1 multiplier, or trickle down effect, coal is responsible for 60,000 more jobs.

We export about 70 percent of our coal production to other states, bringing into Kentucky about $3.5 billion. That’s pretty impressive. Where does this money go? About 85 cents on the dollar stays in Kentucky in the form of wages, benefits, operating costs, taxes, royalties and administrative costs.

In addition to normal business taxes, coal companies pay a coal severance tax that provided $230 million to the state and coal counties in 2006.

On top of that, Kentucky has one of the lowest electricity rates in the United States — thanks again to coal.

Yes, coal companies do make profits. That’s what keeps the economy rolling in the coalfields. And yes, profits do leave Kentucky, but shareholders across America benefit.

“Coal producing counties” the editorial said, are “among the poorest in the nation.” Yes, a few may be. But how is that coal’s fault? I’ve never understood how a $48,000-a-year job creates poverty. It’s the lack of jobs that creates poverty. What we need is a more diverse economy, especially in the Appalachian coalfields.

Counties with the lowest unemployment rates are in the golden triangle: Lexington, Louisville and Northern Kentucky. But coal counties aren’t too far off center compared to other parts of Kentucky.

In fact, the jobless rate declined in almost every coal county in July. Coal counties are doing pretty well, considering that they don’t have a diverse economy or much land for development.

We need to quit the blame game. Let’s all work to bring economic diversity into the coalfields.

Article written by Bill Caylor, President of the Kentucky Coal Association