Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Sen. Evan Bayh to retire is huge blow to Dems

February 15, 2010
By Eric Zimmermann – 02/15/10 10:46 AM ET

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) will announce this afternoon that he will not seek re-election in 2010.

 The news is a big loss for Democrats, opening up a very competitive  seat in what’s shaping up to be a tough cycle for Democrats. 

 Bayh had over $13 million ready to wage a re-election campaign against former Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.), and Democrats had already begun to portray Coats as a Washington lobbyist who abandoned Indiana.

 But Bayh will deny that his decision is due to fears of losing his seat.
“My decision was not motivated by political concern,” Bayh will say, according to prepared remarks of his announcement “Even in the current challenging environment, I am confident in my prospects for re-election.”

 ”But running for the sake of winning an election, just to remain in public office, is not good enough,” he continues. “And it has never been what motivates me. At this time I simply believe I can best contribute to society in another way: creating jobs by helping grow a business, helping guide an institution of higher learning or helping run a worthy charitable endeavor.”

 Bayh also lamented excessive partisanship in the Senate, citing the defeat of a bipartisan commission to deal with the nation’s debt and the collapse of negotiations over a jobs bill.

 ”All of this and much more has led me to believe that there are better ways to serve my fellow citizens, my beloved state and our nation than continued service in Congress,” he said.

 Bayh’s announcement today leaves Indiana Democrats in a tough position. The deadline for a candidate to turn in signatures and qualify for the ballot is tomorrow. Assuming no Democrat meets that deadline, the state party will have the responsibility of choosing a replacement.

 Reps. Baron Hill (D-Ind.) and Brad Ellsworth (D-Ind.) are possible candidates, though if either were to run it would open up a very competitite House seat.

A popular former governor, Bayh was first elected to the Senate in 1998.

Dem Sen. Rockefeller On Obama: “He’s Beginning To Be Not Believable To Me”

February 13, 2010

“He says ‘I’m for clean coal,’ and then he says it in his speeches, but he doesn’t say it in here,” said Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia. “And he doesn’t say it in the minds of my own people. And he’s beginning to not be believable to me.”

To Watch the Entire Video of Senator Rockefeller’s Comments-

http://www.kentuckycoal.com/index.cfm?pageToken=fullStory&newsId=53

Arizona quits Western climate endeavor

February 11, 2010

“Cutting greenhouse gases too expensive” {Governor Brewer}

by Shaun McKinnon – Feb. 11, 2010 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

Arizona will no longer participate in a groundbreaking attempt to limit greenhouse-gas emissions across the West, a change in policy by Gov. Jan Brewer that will include a review of all the state’s efforts to combat climate change.

Brewer stopped short of pulling Arizona out of the multistate coalition that plans to regulate greenhouse gases starting in 2012. But she made it clear in an executive order that Arizona will not endorse the emission-control plan or any program that could raise costs for consumers and businesses.

The governor’s order is another blow to the Western Climate Initiative, a group of seven states and four Canadian provinces that joined forces in 2007 after growing impatient with the federal government to address climate change. The coalition agreed to implement a regional “cap and trade” system, which limits how much pollution companies can emit, then allows them to buy and sell pollution credits.

 Supporters say the system lets the marketplace make polluting more costly, encouraging emitters – factories, power plants and others – to clean up more quickly. So far, California is the only U.S. state in the Western coalition prepared to start the program on schedule in January 2012. The recession and political opposition has slowed legislation to implement the rules in other states.

 The Western group is one of several state-led coalitions formed to regulate greenhouse gases. A group of Northeastern states is in the second year of its cap-and-trade system, one that only regulates electric utilities.

 A federal plan has stalled in the Senate and is unlikely to move anytime soon.

 Arizona’s chief environmental regulator said Brewer’s order, which was signed last week without fanfare, should be seen as a step forward in Arizona’s attempts to foster renewable energy and green jobs.

 ”Arizona needs a green-and-grow approach rather than a cap-and-trade approach,” ADEQ Director Benjamin Grumbles said. “We can make environmental and economic progress, and we can do it by staying engaged and creating green-job opportunities.”

 Brewer ordered the state to continue converting its vehicle fleet so that by January 2012, all vehicles used by the state are hybrids, meet low greenhouse-gas emission standards or use some form of alternative fuel.

 The governor also said Arizona can remain active with the Western coalition by exploring policies related to solar power and other renewable energy sources, growth policies that limit pollution or steps to adapt to the changing climate.

 ”It’s very important for the state to stay engaged, to be at the table, but it’s also important to convey clearly our position on how to make progress,” Grumbles said. “Right now, given the economic downturn, given the complexity of the cap-and-trade scheme being developed, we’re not going to be supportive of it.”

 Arizona joined the effort under its previous governor, Janet Napolitano. The states involved agreed to the cap-and-trade idea, but each would have to implement the rules at its own state level.

 Brewer said legislative approval would be required for Arizona to participate in the regional cap-and-trade plan.

 The Legislature has attempted several times to dismantle the state’s climate-change programs and forbid its participation in the cap-and-trade system. Leaders said Wednesday that lawmakers are unlikely to reconsider their positions.

 ”I do not believe they would,” said Sen. Carolyn Allen, R-Scottsdale, a member of the Senate’s Natural Resources, Infrastructure and Public Debt Committee. “But this Legislature is full of surprises.”

 Environmental groups expressed disappointment at Brewer’s decision. Arizona had been a founding member of the Western climate group and had signed on to the cap-and-trade blueprint released in September 2008.

 ”I think it’s embarrassing for the state of Arizona,” said Sandy Bahr of the Sierra Club in Phoenix. “It demonstrates a real lack of understanding of how significant of a threat climate change is to the state. We ought to be standing at the front of the line to look at solutions.”

 Diane Brown, executive director of the advocacy group Arizona PIRG, said Arizona doesn’t have to abandon other policies that could help reduce global-warming emissions, such as efforts to increase energy efficiency and reduce vehicle pollution.

 ”It is important for Arizona to remain at the table with colleagues in other Western states,” she said. “A number of policies can still take place to reduce global-warming emissions and, in a state with increasing population, it’s particularly important to get ahold of the situation.”

Republic reporter Casey Newton contributed to this article. 

Permits Drag on U.S. Mining Projects

February 8, 2010

Obtaining the permits and approvals needed to build a mine in the U.S. takes an average of seven years, among the longest wait time in the world. So despite having vast underground stores of raw materials, the U.S. is one of the last places miners go to start a project.

At the proposed Kennecott Eagle nickel mine in Michigan’s sparsely populated Upper Peninsula, the wait is at seven years and growing. Global miner Rio Tinto says the project would fill a raw-material gap in the U.S. economy, but the company has yet to produce an ounce of nickel there.

Last month, a state agency issued a final order making state water, air and mine permits effective, but Rio still needs a federal water permit. And the company expects challenges from environmental groups.

To read more click here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703822404575019123766644644.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories

UK Scientist: Climate Docs Maybe Stolen by Spies

February 1, 2010
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: February 1, 2010

Filed at 8:59 a.m. ET

LONDON (AP) — Britain’s former chief science adviser says the theft of climate e-mails from the University of East Anglia in southern England may have been the work of spies.

David King says the theft of the e-mails last year was ”an extraordinarily sophisticated operation.”

In an interview with The Independent newspaper published Monday, King says the timing of the e-mails’ publication online suggested the hack was intended to destabilize the U.N. talks on tackling climate change held last year.

King told the paper he had no inside knowledge of the investigation into the hacking but was basing his comments on his past work with U.S. and British intelligence agencies.

He also speculated that the hacking may have been the work of U.S.-based lobbyists.

National Mining Association and Kentucky Coal Thank Inaugural Members of Bi-Partisan Coal Caucus

January 26, 2010

For Immediate Release

 Contact:

Carol Raulston

(202) 463-2610

craulston@nma.org

 Luke Popovich

(202) 463-2620

lpopovich@nma.org

The following statement was released today by National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn in response to formation of a bi-partisan coal caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives:

 

“On behalf of everyone in the coal community, I want to thank Reps. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Tim Holden (D-Pa.), Dennis Rehberg (R-Mont.); John Salazar (D-Colo.) and John Shimkus (R-Ill.) for their leadership in establishing the House Coal Caucus.  The National Mining Association (NMA) looks forward to working with them and their colleagues as they focus attention on the vital role coal plays in providing affordable energy and good jobs for America.

 “With 240-years of supply, coal continues to be the backbone of our economy—providing half the nation’s electricity at prices that keep American businesses competitive in a global economy and help American households in these tough economic times.

 “We share the caucus’ pride in the more than 130,000 people working today in U.S. coal mining.  Not only are these good jobs that help support communities throughout the country, they are safe jobs—having achieved two consecutive record years in mine safety. 

 “Working together we can do more.  New technologies, such as advanced clean coal and carbon capture and storage, diversified coal utilization and new safety and environmental initiatives underway throughout the coal community can help us usher in 21st Century mining in the U.S.  NMA looks forward to working with the Housel Coal Caucus on the opportunities and challenges before us.”

Brown’s Senate win could hinder climate bill push

January 20, 2010

By Ben Geman

Republican Scott Brown’s stunning win in the Massachusetts Senate race Tuesday does not bode well for Democratic plans to enact climate change legislation in 2010.

At the very least, Brown adds another vote against a cap-and-trade bill – a plan the state senator attacked during his successful campaign against state Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) for the seat held by the late Ted Kennedy.

But more broadly, the rare election of a Republican senator in Massachusetts, which comes amid high unemployment, could fuel Democratic reluctance to take up climate legislation that opponents call harmful to the economy.

Republican and industry activists who oppose cap-and-trade say Brown’s win strengthens their hand.

“What this will do, what a Brown victory will do, is place a focus on growing jobs and improving the economy, and if the perception still exists that cap-and-trade does not fall into that category, it will most likely get cast to the side,” said Republican strategist Ron Bonjean, a former aide to GOP leadership in both chambers.

He argues that wariness of climate legislation among some Democrats in coal-reliant states will spread. “A Brown victory will further the angst beyond those Democrats to the whole Democratic party,” he said in an interview Tuesday before the polls closed.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said last week that he remains committed to bringing up climate and energy legislation this spring, but some environmentalists and Democratic aides have been privately concerned that proposals to cap emissions will fall by the wayside.

“There is definitely a lot of pessimism as it is and this certainly wouldn’t help,” said one Senate Democratic aide this week as Brown moved ahead in the polls.

Already, Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), who opposes cap-and-trade, predicted Tuesday morning that climate legislation would not come up in 2010. He predicts – and hopes – that the chamber will instead take up a package of energy measures that does not include mandatory emissions limits.

But other analysts disagree that a Brown victory is a nail in the coffin for climate change legislation, which narrowly passed the House in June.

Christine Tezak, a veteran energy industry analyst with Robert W. Baird & Co., said in a research note Tuesday that a Coakley loss is far from the end for climate legislation this year. She noted that it could derail Democratic health care legislation, and if that occurs then Democrats will be left seeking other victories.

“While it is very easy to suggest that Congress may want to throw up its hands and do nothing for the balance of the year, incumbent Democrats will need a win – not inaction – to reverse what will be hailed as a significant defeat for their agenda and prove they can govern,” she wrote.

“There may be greater pressure to salvage an energy and climate package. If health care is shelved, there would be time to address it,” she added.

More narrowly, Brown’s win means another “yes” vote for climate legislation that Democrats must seek if climate legislation is brought up this year.

But passing climate legislation has always rested on the need to win support of several moderate GOP members to offset the loss of likely Democratic opponents like Mary Landrieu (La.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.).

“Energy legislation is traditionally regional, not partisan,” said Paul Bledsoe, director of communications and strategy for the bipartisan National Commission on Energy Policy, a group that backs cap-and-trade. “Unlike health care, it has been obvious that energy and climate legislation was going to need significant Republican support to become law.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.