Activists question EPA coal ash numbers

December 29, 2010 by
The Associated Press at 3:40pm on Dec 29, 2010

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Environmental groups seeking to establish coal ash as a hazardous waste are questioning the math of government officials who are developing regulation guidelines.

The groups released an analysis on Wednesday that says the Environmental Protection Agency overestimated the value of recycling the ash, which is a byproduct of burning coal at power plants.

Ash recyclers, who use the substance in consumer products and concrete, oppose the hazardous label.

The EPA is considering the new rules in the wake of a massive December 2008 spill that dumped 5 million cubic yards of ash in and around a Tennessee river.

The Environmental Integrity Project says the EPA exaggerated an estimate that said coal ash recycling is worth $23 billion in pollution avoidance and reduced energy costs. The group estimated that the number is closer to $1.15 billion.

EPA to Regulate Greenhouse Gases; Draws Republican Ire

December 28, 2010 by
By HUMA KHAN and BRIAN HARTMAN
Dec. 23, 2010

The Obama administration announced today it will use the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory power to set limits on carbon dioxide emissions from factories, power plants and refineries, a decision which likely sets the stage for another partisan battle.

The EPA’s mandate will be effective in January, 2011 and comes on the heels of its finding late last year on the dangers of greenhouse gases.

The move gives EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Oregon, and Wyoming, and it will disapprove part of Texas’ Clean Air Act permit program.

With today’s action, power plants and oil refineries will have to obtain federal permits that cap their greenhouse gas emissions.

Republicans charge these new greenhouse gas rules will stifle businesses and kill jobs.

The administration is trying to “regulate what they have been unable to legislate,” said Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan, the Republican set to take over the House Energy and Commerce Committee in January. “This Christmas surprise is nothing short of a backdoor attempt to implement their failed job-killing cap-and-trade scheme.”

Democrats hailed the move as one that would promote a clean energy future for the United States.

“I applaud the EPA for taking this measured and reasonable step toward addressing the pollution that threatens the health and welfare of our families and children,” Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee said in a statement. These pollution control standards would apply to some of the largest emitters of dangerous pollution across the country, while also encouraging investment in the nation’s clean energy technologies.”

Today’s ruling promises to be the template for many future fights between Congress and the White House as the administration, having lost leverage to pass new laws, uses the EPA’s authority to write new rules.

Power plants and oil refineries are the country’s largest sources of carbon dioxide, responsible for about 40 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. But efforts to impose caps on their emissions have been met with great resistance from Republicans and even some Democrats, like incoming Sen. Joe Manchin of coal-producing West Virginia.

Environmental groups today hailed the EPA’s efforts as a critical step forward in what has been a tough political fight.

To read the entire article click here:http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/epa-regulate-greenhouse-gases-draws-republican-ire/story?id=12469305

Mountaintop mining battle escalates

December 21, 2010 by

By Andrew Restuccia - 12/20/10 07:18 PM ET

State of Play: Mountaintop mining battle escalates 

A bipartisan group of coal-country lawmakers is pressing the Obama administration not to block a major West Virginia mountaintop mining project — a campaign that could foreshadow wider energy and environmental battles next year.

House members from West Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia — including the incoming chairmen of the House Appropriations Committee and a key Energy and Commerce Committee panel — wrote to President Obama on Friday expressing “deep concern” over EPA’s potential veto of the Spruce No. 1 mine’s permit. 

A senior EPA official recommended a veto in October but a final decision has not been made.

The letter says the possible nixing of the mine, in concert with EPA’s tougher line on mountaintop mining in general, “are having a chilling effect on the coal industry in Appalachia — an industry that supplies affordable energy to families across the country.” 

The nine signatories include incoming Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.), who will head the Energy and Power Subcommittee, and Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), the current Natural Resources Committee chairman who will be the ranking Democrat on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee in the GOP-led House.

“Perhaps most disturbing, by vetoing a permit that has already been issued, the EPA will spur turmoil across numerous industries and businesses that rely on a fair, transparent, and consistent government permitting program,” adds the letter. It asks for a White House review of the Spruce mine issue and future permitting.

Rockefeller, Manchin hit EPA on mine permit

Across the Capitol, West Virginia’s Senate delegation sent EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson a letter Monday that says an EPA veto of the Army Corps of Engineers’ permit for the Spruce mine would be a “devastating blow” to economic recovery efforts.

“A unilateral decision by EPA to revoke a permit after the permit was lawfully issued will undoubtedly undermine any confidence businesses may have that the government will honor its promises and protect investments,” wrote Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

Congressman Whitfield to Chair Subcommittee

December 16, 2010 by

Commerce Republicans announce subcommittee roles

By Sara Jerome – 12/16/10 03:24 PM ET

Incoming House Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) announced the chairs and vice chairs of the subcommittees on Thursday.

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) will be chairman emeritus of the committee, similar to the position Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) was granted after Rep. Henry Waxman (R-Calif.) ousted him from atop the panel. That likely means Barton gets to sit on every subcommittee. 

Here is the rundown: 

Chairman Emeritus: Joe Barton (TX)

 Vice Chair of Energy and Commerce

Sue Myrick (NC)

 Subcommittee on Communications and Technology

Chair – Greg Walden (OR)

Vice Chair – Lee Terry (NE)

 Subcommittee on Health

Chair – Joe Pitts (PA)

Vice Chair – Mike Burgess (TX)

Subcommittee on Energy and Power

Chair – Ed Whitfield (KY)

Vice Chair – John Sullivan (OK)

 Subcommittee on Environment and Economy

Chair – John Shimkus (IL)

Vice Chair – Tim Murphy (PA)

 Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade

Chair –  Mary Bono Mack (CA)

Vice Chair – Marsha Blackburn (TN)

 Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

Chair – Cliff Stearns (FL)

EPA says environmentalists are overreacting to delays in new air rules

December 10, 2010 by
By Andrew Restuccia – 12/10/10 10:21 AM ET

The Environmental Protection Agency is pushing back against criticism from environmentalists that the agency bowed to pressure from Republicans and industry this week when it announced its intentions to delay the release of two key air rules.

The air rules have gained significant attention in recent days, with environmentalists raising red flags about the delays. The decision to delay the release of the final regulations is the latest example, environmentalists say, of the Obama administration being too willing to compromise with Republicans, who have mounted significant opposition to the rules.

But the EPA rejected those characterizations late Thursday night — EPA spokesman Brendan Gilfillan said environmentalists are reading too much into the delays. 

“These announcements have nothing to do with each other or with the other rules we’ve announced in the past, or will announce in the future, to protect Americans’ health,” Gilfillan said in an e-mail to The Hill. “No one should read anything more into this than the fact that we’re doing what we’ve said we’d do all along: following the best science and the law.”

The EPA on Tuesday filed a motion in federal district court to extend until April 2012 the deadline for releasing a final rule meant to reduce potentially harmful air emissions from industrial boilers. EPA officials have suggested that the initial draft boiler rule is too stringent. In making the announcement Tuesday, the agency said comments from industry on the rule “shed new light” on a number of issues. 

Then, on Wednesday, the EPA said it would delay releasing tougher smog rules until July 2011 in order to get more input from its scientific advisers.

Both proposals have come under attack from Republicans and industry groups, who argue that the rules are just the latest example of the EPA overreaching. But industry groups responded to this week’s delays with the sort of praise rarely given to the agency. The American Chemistry Council, for example, said it was “encouraged” by the EPA’s effort to delay release of the boiler rule. 

Republican lawmakers weighed in on the delay of the smog rule in a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson Thursday. Incoming House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), both vocal critics of the Obama EPA, praised the delay, but said they “remain gravely concerned with the direction the EPA is headed.”

Environmentalists and clean air advocates say they fear the delays are symbolic of a larger retreat by the Obama administration on environmental protections. 

“The fact that EPA coupled these two rules and significantly delayed them — both under sharp attack by Republicans including [Rep.] Fred Upton — suggests EPA wants to avoid a frontal clash with the new Congress,” Clean Air Watch President Frank O’Donnell, a prominent clean air advocate, said in an e-mail to The Hill.

Bill Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, which represents air pollution control agencies around the country, expressed similar concerns. “It is regrettable that EPA has postponed two very important air pollution control regulations that have such huge public health impacts,” he said in an e-mail. “We hope these postponements are not the beginning of an unfortunate pattern of future EPA delays.”

http://thehill.com/

Rogers outlines appropriations agenda

December 9, 2010 by

By Vicki Needham

Newly minted House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) outlined several of his priorities Wednesday, including the creation of investigative teams to examine spending issues within specific programs. 

Rogers, who will helm the panel when House Republicans take over the majority in the 112th Congress, said he intends to cut spending back to fiscal 2008 levels, pass all 12 spending bills in the House and uphold the earmark ban pushed by his party.

To root out areas to cut spending, Rogers wants to form panels of committee members to “go after a specific problem,” he said during a conference call with reporters. 

The new chairman said he had spoken with Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) on the possibility of creating an oversight subcommittee but thought the move might discourage the 12 subpanels from performing their own budgetary oversight. He’s calling on the subcommittees to be “vigorous in their oversight,” so he’s opted for the investigative panels to be formed when needed to look at specific spending issues. 

“This is a better way to get at what we both want to do,” he said. 

Finding those possible spending cuts will be crucial for spending to drop to 2008 levels — by about an estimated $100 billion. 

Although it will take time to assemble a list of possible budget cuts, Rogers suggested starting with unspent or unobligated stimulus funds or by not hiring new agents at the IRS to oversee the new healthcare law, he said. 

Democrats have said those monies will be spent or obligated by the end of the year. 

“Everything is on the table,” he said. 

Passing all 12 spending bills is another key agenda item and will help in rooting out unnecessary spending and transforming the process, he said. 

“We don’t need more omnibus bills, they are a magnet for wasteful spending,” he said. 

The spending process should be transparent and the bills will be open for amendment, “and let the chips fall where they may,” he said. 

Earmarks are another issue that could create consternation between the two chambers next year, with Democrats still controlling the Senate and many of those lawmakers voicing support for the practice. 

Rogers, who has been criticized for his earmarking prowess, said he supports and will enforce the moratorium on earmarks in the House and will strip out any earmarks contained in Senate spending bills that come his way.

“In this era there’s a true fiscal crisis, so I will forgo earmarks,” he said. 

He doesn’t expect the policy to hinder his ability to find a compromise on spending measures with Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii). 
“I can’t imagine there will be a problem,” he said. 
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/appropriations/132775-rogers-outlines-appropriations-agenda

GOP taps Hal Rogers for House Appropriations Committee Chair

December 8, 2010 by

By SIMMI AUJLA

House Republicans have tapped Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) to be chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, setting up an old bull appropriator with a history of earmarking to deliver on the anti-spending tea party platform that carried the GOP to victory this fall.

The House GOP Steering Committee selected him for the powerful position Tuesday. The entire Republican conference is expected to confirm his bid Wednesday.

Rogers, a member of the appropriations panel since 1983, has been adept at securing earmarks for his district. In his bid for the chairmanship, he promised the GOP he’d overhaul the committee, ending the earmark process. He has vowed to strip funding for health care.

At the same time, Rogers has said he’s planning to immediately shake up the staff, cutting it by 20 percent. He’s also considering hiring a former lobbyist and vice president of Lockheed Martin, a major defense contractor, as staff director for the committee.

Rogers has promised to work with party leaders to slash discretionary spending to 2008 levels. He plans to devote one committee staffer to pore over spending bills to hunt down duplicative funding.

“The nation is in a fiscal crisis, and hard decisions are coming,” Rogers said in a statement. “I look forward to working with Leadership and my Republican colleagues in fighting for serious reforms of the Committee, bringing fiscal sanity back to our budgeting process, performing vigorous oversight of the failed job-creation policies of the Obama Administration and moving our nation forward
To read the entire article click here:  http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46096.html

Al Gore’s climate group shrinking

December 6, 2010 by

By DARREN SAMUELSOHN

One of Al Gore‘s campaigns to save the planet has scaled back its field operations since climate legislation failed earlier this year in Congress.

The Alliance for Climate Protection was operating in about 25 states at its peak, including Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

But the group now has field offices in just seven states.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/45985.html

Republicans cut House climate panel

December 1, 2010 by
By Michael O’Brien – 12/01/10

The special committee set up by Democrats in 2007 to study energy and climate issues will disappear in the next Congress, its top Republican said Wednesday.

Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), the ranking member of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, said that Wednesday morning’s hearing by the panel would be the last.

Sensenbrenner confirmed that Republicans will let the committee, which was established by House Democrats after they retook the majority in 2007, would fold up shop as had been rumored. 

To read the entire article:  http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/131431-republicans-cut-house-climate-panel

Killing U.S. coal mining is economically stupid

November 30, 2010 by

Editorials

Charleston Daily Mail

Monday November 29, 2010
Nations that burn it or supply it are creating plenty of new jobs………….

President Obama announced in March an ambitious plan to double U.S. exports within five years. “In a time when millions of Americans are out of work, boosting our exports is a short-term imperative,” he said.

If it is, the administration needs to rethink its economically suicidal policy with respect to coal, for which there is robust international demand.

Other nations are making a lot of money and creating a lot of jobs with the reliable, affordable fuel the administration doesn’t want Americans to use

“Coal is the fastest-growing fuel in the world and will continue to be largely driven by the enormous appetite for energy in Asia,” Vic Svec, senior vice president of Peabody Energy, told the New York Times.

“The growth and shifts in coal exports to China are impressive, flowering even during the recession,” wrote Elizabeth Rosenthal of the Times. “Seaborne trade in thermal coal rose to about 690 million tons this year, up from 385 million tons in 2001.

“The price rose to $60 from $40 a ton five years ago to a high of $200 in 2008. Coal delivered to southern China currently sells for $114 per ton.”

Yet China was a net exporter of coal until 2009. It will import as much as 150 million tons this year.

Last year, the United States exported only 2,714 tons of coal to China. That rose to 2.9 million tons in the first six months of this year, but the United States still accounts for what Rosenthal termed “a minuscule fraction” of China’s coal imports.

India is another huge market. It imported 36 million tons of coal in 2008 – and 60 million tons in 2009.

The Chinese and Indian economies are roaring. The pitiful state of the U.S. economy just cost the president much of the support he enjoyed in Congress.

And much of this damage is self-inflicted.

Other regions of the world, including Australia and South America, are supplying the demand for coal. An Australian company signed a $60 billion contract – the nation’s largest export contract ever – to supply coal to Chinese power stations starting in 2013.

Australia exported $508 million worth of coal to China in 2008 – and $5.6 billion worth last year.

Yet the administration has cast its lot with the likes of the Sierra Club, which estimates that it has helped to block 139 proposed coal-burning plants in the United States in recent years.

The administration’s war on coal robs the U.S. economy of the affordable energy it needs to recover. Further damaging the industry here will do even more damage to the U.S. balance of trade, and job creation.

Strangling the coal industry here, while other nations encourage it, won’t help the environment or the economy. It’s time U.S. policy reflected that.

The Sierra Club isn’t responsible for economic well-being. The administration is.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.